The Behaviour of Space

In Conventional QM Einstein described the nature of space at an observable level.
This was an important step towards advancing physics.

It may seem puzzling why the complex particle takes such a strange shape?
Well the atom is populary shown to be spherical and it can be considered the shape of a differential particle.
It is no coincidence that this particle takes the same shape as our 3D universe as the same forces are at work.
However I admit I am the first person to say that formally here. The mathematics used at this level is basically calculus.

To describe a space below that of the differential particle we need a different mathematics.

I therefore use the converse of Conventional QM by saying that this new mathematics shows or describes the properties and behaviour of that new space.

In the case of Complex QM complex mathematics describes the properties and geometry of complex space which you will realise now will not be spherical or there could be no division between the two spaces.

By providing a different mathematical basis for complex space I can show that it can remain independent of normal space but interconnect with it (as the mathematics shows and describes).
The geometry of the complex particle is therefore a Ztar which may seem strange but this is the shape the mathematics demands for complex space to obey all the rules of complex mathematics.

Of course it becomes increasingly difficult to find a new mathematics to define a new sub space.

This was the problem with Fractal QM but fractal mathematics serves the purpose.

So it seems unlikely that there is any space below that of Fractal Space.