Bode's Planetary Law

Bode's Law is explained at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius-Bode_law

where it states that:
The first mention of a series approximating Bode's Law is found in David Gregory's "The Elements of Astronomy", published in 1715. In it, he says,
"...supposing the distance of the Earth from the Sun to be divided into ten equal Parts, of these the distance of Mercury will be about four, of Venus seven, of Mars fifteen, of Jupiter fifty two, and that of Saturn ninety five."
A similar sentence, likely paraphrased from Gregory, appears in a work published by Christian Wolff in 1724.

This supports my view that the mass of the planets conforms to one huge phase of an F wave.
I believe that the inclination of the planets follow a T wave (smaller amplitude F wave).
What Bode said fits in with my ideas for complex waves.
Although on the complex plane they are logarithmically distributed that changes when they are transmissible into real space. When a force is applied to the complex plane it folds! In order to align with a real 3D plane the phases become of equal length.
So although we can model the planets occuring along such a wave Bode shows that there are in fact specific sites long the T Wave that favour a planet's position.
This is not a problem for Complex QM and I can actually provide a reason.
If you remember, I said that the mass of the planets conforms to one huge phase of an F wave. It is therefore the combined effect of teh F wave and T wave that determines a planet's position.

Problems with Bode's Law
Bode's Law does become more inaccurate as we move out to the margins of the Solar system. Perhaps one reason for this is that it does not take into account a planet's mass.
At Wikipaedia we have "From Mars, according to Bode, there follows a space of 4+24=28 such parts, but so far no planet was sighted there. But should the Lord Architect have left that space empty? ". Well the answer can now be put forward that a second wave is present creating a combined effect upon the planets.
Kepler's Second Law also places a constraint on planetary spacing.
Kepler's Second Law is also compatable with Complex QM as a real ellipse can be derived from a complex hyperbola (shape of my Ztar) if the variable y is changed to (iy). That is if the y axis becomes complex or the situation is described by a complex plane that rotates into and out of real space.
Kepler's requirement for an equal amount of work to be done between equal angles also agrees with my assertion that the F wave determines that Jupiter exists near the top of the phase. At this position (if the F wave phase were replaced by half a Kepler ellipese the arc would have a greater perimeter. This suggests a greater perimeter for the planet (such as Jupiter in this example).