Notes on Dr Mills Theory 1

These are brief notes of my inspection of Dr Mills work at the website below. I am referring here to the review of Dr Milll’s work mentioned at:

http://hydrino.org/faqs.html#Winners%20and%20losers

where the following notice is given:
Disclaimers and legal stuff:
5. You may quote from this FAQ for non-profit purposes as long as appropriate credits are maintained.
Original author and maintainer: Steven Florek (c) 2000 All rights reserved
An examination of Dr. Randell Mills’ Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP)

Introduction
By agreement I use Complex QM to refer Complex Quantum Mechanics while Dr Mills term Classical Quantum Mechanics or CQM refers to his Atomic Theory.

Q. What the heck is so interesting about this CQM theory Mills has developed?
A. Classical quantum mechanics (CQM) is a theory developed by Dr. Randell L. Mills of BlackLight Power with contributions from Dr. John Farrell of Franklin & Marshall College. Both men come from chemistry backgrounds.
My approach comes from a mathematical perspective.

In CQM, particles are not infinitesimal points nor probability waves surrounding infinitesimal point particles. They are spinning 2D electric and magnetic flux surfaces (”orbitspheres”) that deform into various geometries under different conditions.
I do not believe this. I maintain that there are particles but I believe the association of these flux surfaces helps to explain the behaviour of these particles.
Mills insight into the resolution of wave-particle duality leads to explanations of counter-intuitive quantum particle behaviour but is clearer and more consistent with Complex QM nevertheless I see this work as a possible basis for Complex QM.
Dr Mills has developed a Grand Unified Theory (GUT) that unifies all of the forces but does not identify those forces.
In CQM, physics at all scales, from the macro to the micro, follows the same laws and mathematics. Like any theory that purports to dramatically overturn other, more well-established physical theories, CQM needs to be subjected to rigorous theoretical, experimental and mathematical exploration. As Carl Sagan said, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.”
I would answer that my rewriting of complex mathematics and applying it to Quantum Mechanics (QM) is rigorous in this respect.
back to top
Q. What is GUT-CQM?
A.
In order to understand it Mills CQM, readers of his book will need an education in Fourier integrals, optics, elementary mechanics and electrodynamics, and at least undergraduate level quantum mechanics.
Complex QM needs no prior knowledge but a high school education in complex mathematics would be helpful.
Theory Basics
Q. What is an orbitsphere?
A. A simple orbitsphere is a spherical, rotating charge-density of zero thickness, which makes it an essentially two-dimensional object.
This is a weakness in Dr Mills theory. My complex particle can exist in a 3D or 4D state. I would
Apply Dr Mills work in 3D with three orthogonal Orbitspheres. If this approach is taken my approach to the behaviour of the Sun sits well with this.
I suppose my work on complex winding also ties in with this as the Orbitspheres generally have multiple angular momentum vectors and are made up of an infinite series of lines of electric and magnetic flux (which I would view as a position vector upon the complex particle).

continued on page 2