Notes on Dr Mills Theory 2

continued from page 1
Orbitspheres are forced to wrap around a central force (such as a nucleus) in a minimum energy configuration. Free electrons, for example, assume a two- dimensional disk-like form when liberated from their atoms. Orbitspheres are a general case of spheroidal quantum orbitals that can be elliptical, oblate, prolate, etc., as in the case of electron orbitals.

In Complex QM there is no need for a change in the shape of the complex particle until the warping of space changes it from spherical in 3D to hyper-cubic in 4D. However there is room to consider the electric and magnetic flux surfaces undergoing these changes and I resist finalising my opinion now.

These orbitspheres represent minimum energy configurations where complex interacting forces are at play.
This is very similar to what I am saying in Complex QM but I doubt if Dr Mills means “complex force” as I do.
Q. What is an electron orbitsphere?
A. In the case of the electron orbitsphere, the surface consists of perpendicular electric and magnetic field lines. These lines rotate in three perpendicular axes such that all points on the surface of the orbitsphere move at the same angular velocity.

This supports what I said previously, above, about taking three orthogonal orbitspheres as a better representation.
back to top
Q. What is a photon orbitsphere?
A. There are several different kinds of photon orbitspheres, corresponding to the well-known linear, right-handed, left-handed, circular, and elliptical orbitspheres and their permutations. Right- and left-handed photons are shaped a bit like fat barrels (if you can picture that) with flat tops. Rotations of this orbitsphere and its motion through space-time correspond to the classical wave model of the photon. All of the other properties of the photon are as expected.

Well I would view this as the distortion of Dr Mills Orbitsphere. I can thus tie this into the distortion of the fabric of space. I believe Dr Mills has missed this possibility. The fact that Dr Mills has more than one type of photon Orbitsphere shows different positions for the photon on my F wave.

Q. What is a nuclear orbitsphere?
A. A quark is an orbitsphere with a fractional charge of +/- 1/3 or +/- 2/3.
A gluon is a massive photon orbitsphere. Each quark is paired with a gluon in a charge density representing an l=1 spherical harmonic. Visually, this looks like a fat dumbbell.
I do not necessarily accept the notion of quark and gluon pairing. This should upset a lot of people. I view the energy/mass levels and consequent behaviour of these particles as most important and the situation is more complicated that the present popular view affords.
Mills’ nuclear theory is less well-developed than his electron theory but I accept that his concept of the shape of the nuclear Orbitsphere could be correct and helpful in extending Complex QM.
Q. What about other types of particles?
A. All of the quarks, leptons, bosons, and hadrons of the Standard Model are accounted for — CQM even explains why there are three generations of these particles.
I would be interested to see this.

continued on page 3
Q. Which principles of current physics theory does CQM accept and which principles does it reject?
A. We will list them here for reference without explanation, as explanation is given throughout this FAQ.
Still valid:
+ Conservation of mass-energy
+ Conservation of linear and angular momentum
+ Maxwell’s equations
+ Newton’s laws
+ Special Relativity
+ General Relativity (from a different derivation than Einstein’s)
+ Quantum behavior of particles
+ de Broglie relations
+ Planck’s equation
Rejected:
+ Schrödinger’s equation
+ Born interpretation of the Schrödinger’s equation as a probability density
+ Standard Model
+ Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
+ Entanglement and correlation
I would entirely endorse these views.
Q. The electron orbitsphere-nucleus system is in a very delicate force balance between charge attraction and centrifugal force. Furthermore, Earlshaw’s Theorem states that stable configurations of fixed magnets are not possible. When the atom is subjected to some external perturbing force that would tend to knock the electron orbitsphere off-balance, how does the orbitsphere maintain mechanical stability rather than crash into the nucleus due to an imbalance in charge attraction?
A.