Spintronics 4

Continued from page 3
The different phases presented to the electrons following paths ABC and DEF by the iron atoms account for their different behaviour. I expect that since these paths (top picture) are both outward towards A (from C) and F (from D) and not continuous from FEDCBA (that also represents a complete wavelength) then this could be an induction factor (caused by the iron atoms having reversed spin and polarity) reversing the expected behaviour along DEF. However this is a chicken and egg scenario and I expect that the truth may well be that either circumstance (cause or effect) can be present depending upon circumstances.
Spin and Charge Currents
The original diagram (a) for the experiments is also difficult to interpret but now I have some basis for doing so.

In figure “Spin and Charge Currents” the ratios of mass to energy are schematic and not available from experimental data. However using this scheme it is possible to get the same outcome as the Spintronics experiments! For the charge current the initial electrons may have a 50%+ energy ratio to mass while for the spin current the initial electrons may have a 50%- energy ratio to mass. This seems more likely for the charge cuurent to allow the energy/charge to accumulate.
Conclusion
There is now a basis for re-interpreting Spintronics in Complex QM terms. It is far too early to comment any more comprehensively and I would appreciate comments from physicists working in this field. I am pleased that I have found some correspondence although it could be argued it lies more in Mass to Energy conversion than in Complex QM terms.
I have previously considered charge as a surfeit of energy over mass. Spin can be considered as the reverse and seems to act in a similar manner to a skater who pulls in their arms and legs to revolve faster. This is not to automatically equate a smaller mass radius with increased angular momentum but to suggest that there is a link.
I am beginning to see that when I stated that that spin can be associated with a mass rich particle and charge can be associated with an energy rich particle. I was nearly correct. I am believe that angular momentum can be associated with a mass rich particle or energy to mass transfer and magnetic momentum can be associated with an energy rich particle or a mass to energy transfer. So at present a more complicated picture seems to be emerging and perhaps this may be clouding the issue but some correspondence could exist and I mention the possibility here. I expect that spin generally will not change in an electron unless it is subject to outside forces. So we can still associate spin with the amount of mass present in the electron while charge can be with the amount of energy present in the electron. However if we accept that the mass to energy transference is defined by the V wave then spin and charge must vary (ay least slightly).
When we consider this alongside angular momentum and magnetic momentum a more complicated picture emerges that still needs clarifying.
Perhaps spin and charge may hold constant (as a combined dynamic system) because angular momentum and magnetic momentum maintain a constant magnetic field resulting in no observable difference?